For articles published on a gold open access basis, we generally only require that IOP is granted a non-exclusive licence. What happens after you have submitted your revised article?įor most IOP Publishing (IOP) hybrid journals (journals which offer the choice of publishing on a subscription basis or on a gold open access basis), we generally require you to transfer (assign) the copyright in your subscription article to IOP (or to the relevant publishing partner) before acceptance of the article. You will subsequently be asked to complete and submit the online copyright form, if you have not done so already, and to provide written permissions if your article makes use of any previously published material or material for which you are not the copyright owner. If you experience any problems submitting your article online, please contact the journal for assistance. Note that all co-authors need to approve any changes made to the author list after submission. If you need to make any changes to the author list, please contact the journal explaining the change (see our section on what constitutes authorship). In addition, you will need to submit your point-by-point response to the referees and either a list of the changes made or a version of the manuscript with the changes highlighted. When submitting a revised article, we require you to upload the revised PDF file (deleting the original version) and your latest set of the source files used to create the revised PDF (typically Word or LaTeX files). Please submit all revised submissions via the link in the e-mail you received informing you of the decision and asking you to make the revisions. What files to submit for your revised article If the referee(s) and Editorial Board are not satisfied with the changes to your manuscript, it may still be rejected at this stage. If you are using LaTeX you can use the “latexdiff” command.īy observing these guidelines, you will be assisting the referees who voluntarily give up their time to review manuscripts (we recommend that you thank the reviewers for their time and input). If you are using Microsft Word, you can use the “tracked changes” function. It is also helpful if you supply us with both a clean version of your revised article, and a marked-up version which shows the changes you have made. Please make sure that you send your revised article to us, and not simply the original version again. Try to address both referees’ comments in some way. Try to be conciliatory and, when resolving conflicting reviews, express the view that both reviewers have a point and find some middle ground. It is inadvisable to point out to a referee that their views are invalid just because they contradict the other referee. Sometimes referees contradict each other. This may require new evidence, clarification of points in new language, new maths, new experiments, or more references (ideally with the relevant text from that reference extracted in your response, for the convenience of the reviewer). If you disagree with a referee you should be extremely clear (and polite) about why you think you are right and they are wrong. It may only be a new citation and a few new words (or removed words) in a sentence. You should justify your responses, and any additional material should appear in the manuscript. You should copy each referee comment into a separate document and add a response below each comment (and refer to the manuscript line numbers when referring to changes in the main text) to assist editors and referees with checking revisions as quickly as possible.įor each point, take the time to detail exactly what you have changed (quote the exact text before and after) and where it has changed in the manuscript. In addition to submitting your article files, we require a list of all the changes made and a polite point-by-point response to each referee comment (even if you disagree) before we consider the revision. It is important that you read each referee report very carefully and address all of the referees’ comments and requests when preparing your revised article. It is common for our referees to request that authors make revisions to their articles.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |